PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.14%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 9.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.59%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 2.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.04%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 23.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.72%
Margin expansion 50-75% of AEM's 13.10%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
G&A growth while AEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449.59%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.79%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.11%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7152.63%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 16.99%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-15.34%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 12.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.43%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 299.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 23.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 55.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.89%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 42.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-88.56%
Other expenses reduction while AEM shows 21029.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.83%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 597.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while AEM shows 539.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.81%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of AEM's 74.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-32.95%
Net income decline while AEM shows 786.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.20%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 712.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
EPS decline while AEM shows 760.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 757.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 2.94%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 3.07%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.