95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.55%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 13.81%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
16.66%
Similar cost growth to AEM's 17.49%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
29.24%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 7.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.60%
Margin expansion while AEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.98%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.67%
Similar total costs growth to AEM's 15.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-97.39%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 52.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.44%
Similar D&A growth to AEM's 27.08%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
42.01%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.39%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 2.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
37.10%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 9.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.97%
Operating margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
99.98%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.81%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
193.24%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 8.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
26.98%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.12%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 5.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 5.33%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.