PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
44.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 9.91%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
45.91%
Cost growth above 1.5x AEM's 6.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
43.20%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 18.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Margin decline while AEM shows 8.21% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.26%
G&A growth less than half of AEM's 90.09%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.66%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.30%
Operating expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.90%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.56%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 1.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
53.28%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.51%
EBITDA growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.13%
EBITDA margin decline while AEM shows 5.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.82%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 39.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.39%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-107.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
39.66%
Pre-tax income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.63%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
44.74%
Net income growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Net margin growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.24%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AEM's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.