95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Revenue decline while AEM shows 0.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.18%
Gross profit decline while AEM shows 14.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.28%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 13.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.10%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
140.62%
Marketing expense growth while AEM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
70.89%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 27.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-28.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.73%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.63%
Interest expense reduction while AEM shows 0.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.57%
EBITDA decline while AEM shows 733.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.65%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of AEM's 4.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-4.08%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 19.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 18.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
888.96%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 89.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-3.79%
Pre-tax income decline while AEM shows 246.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 244.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
99.20%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of AEM's 141.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-2.61%
Net income decline while AEM shows 188.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of AEM's 187.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.26%
EPS decline while AEM shows 187.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 187.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.23%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.46%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.