95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.19%
Revenue growth below 50% of AEM's 13.97%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-9.45%
Cost reduction while AEM shows 1.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.00%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AEM's 37.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.71%
Margin expansion below 50% of AEM's 20.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.61%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 1.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
375.31%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 95.32%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
3913.82%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.05%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.40%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.63%
Total costs reduction while AEM shows 1.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.70%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.09%
D&A reduction while AEM shows 6.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.21%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AEM's 27.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.52%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AEM's 12.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of AEM's 40.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AEM's 23.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-33.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AEM's 45.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.60%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AEM's 27.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
188027.38%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x AEM's 68.63%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-25.44%
Net income decline while AEM shows 35.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.31%
Net margin decline while AEM shows 19.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while AEM shows 37.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AEM shows 36.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.33%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.