PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.44%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 2.34%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-42.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
60.21%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AEM's 8.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.79%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x AEM's 6.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
G&A reduction while AEM shows 27.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6243.42%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 670.67%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
825.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AEM's 156.91%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
98.70%
Total costs growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.07%
Interest expense growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.81%
D&A growth while AEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.15%
Operating income decline while AEM shows 5.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.84%
Operating margin decline while AEM shows 3.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.72%
Other expenses growth while AEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
35.25%
Tax expense growth while AEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-43.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.25%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AEM's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.