95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.93%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-29.83%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.75%
Margin decline while FNV shows 0.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.76%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-55.20%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-32.61%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while FNV shows 42.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.00%
D&A reduction while FNV shows 1.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.95%
EBITDA decline while FNV shows 1.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.25%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 3.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-19.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.58%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-119.18%
Other expenses reduction while FNV shows 43.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.84%
Pre-tax income decline while FNV shows 0.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while FNV shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.17%
Tax expense reduction while FNV shows 2.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.31%
Net income decline while FNV shows 0.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.72%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 2.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-10.00%
EPS decline while FNV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.11%
Diluted EPS decline while FNV shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.01%
Share count change of 4.01% while FNV is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while FNV shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.