95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.51%
Positive growth while FNV shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
75.60%
Cost increase while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
62.95%
Positive growth while FNV shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.30%
Margin decline while FNV shows 0.29% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
58.45%
Total costs growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.09%
D&A growth while FNV reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
85.52%
EBITDA growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.10%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 6.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
82.56%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FNV's 2.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.34%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of FNV's 12.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-109.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
82.05%
Pre-tax income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Pre-tax margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.87%
Tax expense growth while FNV reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.05%
Net income growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.04%
Net margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.14%
EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of FNV's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FNV's 9.47%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.