95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.94%
Revenue growth below 50% of FNV's 12.37%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.14%
Cost reduction while FNV shows 11.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
3.70%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FNV's 12.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.73%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x FNV's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
Similar G&A growth to FNV's 67.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42650.00%
Other expenses change of 42650.00% while FNV maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
61.11%
Similar operating expenses growth to FNV's 67.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
4.24%
Total costs growth less than half of FNV's 14.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
417.94%
Interest expense growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.41%
D&A reduction while FNV shows 6.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.17%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FNV's 7.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.01%
Operating income decline while FNV shows 7.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
221.93%
Other expenses growth while FNV reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.31%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FNV's 7.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.37%
Pre-tax margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-76.49%
Tax expense reduction while FNV shows 48.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.54%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 2.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.60%
Net margin growth while FNV declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 2.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FNV's 2.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.13%
Share count change of 0.13% while FNV is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FNV's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.