95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.97%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
10.64%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.43%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 14.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.47%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 79.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-17.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.45%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.97%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSM's 6.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.59%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.38%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 9.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.42%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.03%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 14.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.68%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.90%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 13.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.91%
Tax expense growth less than half of FSM's 51.36%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.07%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.57%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.11%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.29%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.