PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.12%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.63%
Growth of 9.63% while FSM shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
13.43%
Margin change of 13.43% while FSM shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-22.06%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 42.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.25%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 42.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.51%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.25%
Margin change of 14.25% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
17.56%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Margin change of 21.64% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-52.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.48%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.52%
Margin change of 20.52% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
775.68%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 177.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.89%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.71%
Margin change of 13.71% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-5.00%
EPS decline while FSM shows 26.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 26.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.37%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 274.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
20.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 274.03%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.