95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
84.41%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
42.40%
Cost growth of 42.40% while FSM maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
113.04%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.53%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.44%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 7.76%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
210.38%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.27%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.27%
D&A growth less than half of FSM's 8444.13%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
114.39%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.32%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
101.43%
Similar operating income growth to FSM's 93.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.23%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1003.33%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
103.40%
Similar pre-tax income growth to FSM's 116.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.30%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2831.71%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.56%
Net income growth 50-75% of FSM's 116.02%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-1.00%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
71.43%
EPS growth 50-75% of FSM's 116.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
57.14%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 116.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.56%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 38.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
16.72%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 38.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.