95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.91%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.49%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.92%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.28%
Margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.54%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.73%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSM's 1290.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.98%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 1290.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.10%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.70%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.10%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.51%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-121.15%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.54%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 579.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.60%
Margin change of 1.60% while FSM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-16.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.18%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.61%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.64%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 74.11%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.