95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.79%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 23.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
11.60%
Cost increase while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
45.14%
Similar gross profit growth to FSM's 46.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
11.83%
Margin expansion 50-75% of FSM's 18.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
G&A growth less than half of FSM's 76.77%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Operating expenses growth less than half of FSM's 79.15%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.63%
Total costs growth 50-75% of FSM's 22.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.80%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.69%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.25%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 26.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.76%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 2.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
135.66%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 34.74%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
51.37%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 325.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.63%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 243.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.23%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 64.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
51.37%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 286.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.63%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 250.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.36%
EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 286.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 286.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.22%
Share count change of 9.22% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
9.14%
Diluted share change of 9.14% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.