95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.55%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-38.61%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
42.29%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
28.71%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.97%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-35.51%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.29%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.31%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
30.26%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.13%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.40%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.86%
Operating margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4021.42%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 73225.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 1.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 21.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2353.67%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.33%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 17.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
7.94%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 41.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-73.33%
EPS decline while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.23%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.16%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 10.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while FSM shows 8.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.