PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.28%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 23.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
52.94%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSM's 26.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.67%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 22.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 616.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1803.01%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-157.58%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 791.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.58%
Total costs growth less than half of FSM's 239.89%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.49%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 10.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.36%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.44%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-131.15%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
30.00%
Net income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.04%
Net margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.00%
EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.40%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.45%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.