PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
61.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 32.54%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
22.81%
Cost growth less than half of FSM's 102.39%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
80.95%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.30%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.55%
G&A growth while FSM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.45%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
547.98%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
88.65%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.04%
D&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 8.16%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
45.74%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 273.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.55%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 41.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.00%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 125.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.53%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 70.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
140.04%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
77.13%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 1592.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.93%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 1226.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-84.22%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 127.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.62%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 266.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.24%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 225.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
157.14%
EPS growth 50-75% of FSM's 266.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
157.14%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of FSM's 266.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.51%
Share count change of 2.51% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.79%
Diluted share change of 2.79% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.