PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.93%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 13.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.84%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 13.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.34%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 12.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.24%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 48.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1243.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.77%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 44.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.35%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 19.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.44%
Interest expense change of 97.44% while FSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-32.92%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 7.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.74%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 30.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.54%
EBITDA margin growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.55%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 46.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.21%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 28.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2074.36%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.62%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 45.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 28.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-81.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.36%
Net income decline while FSM shows 108.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.71%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 83.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.00%
EPS decline while FSM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.05%
Share count change of 0.05% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.