PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
78.11%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
153.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
56.56%
Positive growth while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.08%
G&A growth while FSM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.59%
Other expenses growth less than half of FSM's 574.19%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
84.79%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.89%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1333.12%
Interest expense growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
230.63%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
75.24%
EBITDA growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
56.27%
Operating income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-163.83%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 166.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.64%
Pre-tax income growth while FSM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1487.52%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.49%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 5.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-16.63%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 22.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.06%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 16.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 16.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.14%
Share count change of 0.14% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.