95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.80%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 0.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.06%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.19%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.88%
Margin expansion while FSM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.70%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.92%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 112.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-46.37%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 4.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.05%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 3.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.35%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 14.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.75%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 12.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.19%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 27.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.88%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 27.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1578.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-288.47%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 29.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-302.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 29.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5700.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-278.54%
Net income decline while FSM shows 998.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-291.57%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 993.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.62%
EPS decline while FSM shows 1011.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.62%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 1011.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of FSM's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.06%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.