PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.78%
Cost increase while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.55%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 5.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.36%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x FSM's 5.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 26.58%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 20.99%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.61%
Total costs growth above 1.5x FSM's 0.44%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
31.12%
Interest expense growth less than half of FSM's 789.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.87%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.85%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.36%
EBITDA margin decline while FSM shows 15.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.25%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.17%
Share count change of 0.17% while FSM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.