95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.79%
Revenue decline while FSM shows 53.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.92%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 40.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.44%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 106.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.77%
Margin decline while FSM shows 34.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
G&A reduction while FSM shows 0.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-692.49%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 98.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-14.58%
Total costs reduction while FSM shows 35.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
116.67%
Similar interest expense growth to FSM's 135.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-16.90%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 54.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.16%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 122.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.91%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 51.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.01%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 487.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.45%
Operating margin decline while FSM shows 282.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.80%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-17.66%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 730.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while FSM shows 441.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.14%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 534.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.73%
Net income decline while FSM shows 775.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.30%
Net margin decline while FSM shows 470.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.88%
EPS decline while FSM shows 750.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.88%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 743.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.63%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.01%
Diluted share reduction while FSM shows 0.60% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.