PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.18%
Gross profit decline while FSM shows 31.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.28%
Margin expansion below 50% of FSM's 59.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.10%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
140.62%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x FSM's 80.50%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
70.89%
Other expenses change of 70.89% while FSM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-28.25%
Operating expenses reduction while FSM shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.73%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.63%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.57%
EBITDA decline while FSM shows 1446.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.65%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 16.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.08%
Operating income decline while FSM shows 46.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 77.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
888.96%
Other expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.79%
Pre-tax income decline while FSM shows 157.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 170.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
99.20%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.61%
Net income decline while FSM shows 127.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 133.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.26%
EPS decline while FSM shows 127.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while FSM shows 127.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 0.53%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.