95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.09%
Revenue growth 50-75% of FSM's 4.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-2.08%
Cost reduction while FSM shows 3.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.25%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of FSM's 8.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
3.06%
Similar margin change to FSM's 3.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.23%
G&A growth while FSM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while FSM shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-95.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.07%
Operating expenses growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.73%
Total costs growth while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.39%
Interest expense reduction while FSM shows 15.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.61%
D&A reduction while FSM shows 4.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4.01%
EBITDA growth below 50% of FSM's 19.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.89%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of FSM's 13.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth below 50% of FSM's 31.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.98%
Operating margin growth below 50% of FSM's 25.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
62.20%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x FSM's 28.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.39%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of FSM's 36.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.23%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of FSM's 30.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-45.54%
Tax expense reduction while FSM shows 96.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.42%
Similar net income growth to FSM's 24.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
22.63%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 18.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
25.93%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 23.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 23.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x FSM's 2.16%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.