95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.62%
Positive growth while FSM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
135.58%
Cost increase while FSM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.89%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FSM's 8.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.39%
Margin decline while FSM shows 12.97% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.26%
G&A growth above 1.5x FSM's 30.41%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-98.02%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-85.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-31.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-93.52%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
11.28%
D&A growth while FSM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
92.10%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 13.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
55.39%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 18.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
147.14%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 73.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
99.91%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x FSM's 81.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-21.40%
Other expenses reduction while FSM shows 65.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
136.74%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x FSM's 87.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
91.50%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to FSM's 95.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
14.97%
Tax expense growth while FSM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
188.14%
Net income growth below 50% of FSM's 415.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
133.07%
Net margin growth below 50% of FSM's 437.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
194.74%
EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 522.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of FSM's 423.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.01%
Share count increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while FSM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.