95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Positive growth while GFI shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.78%
Cost growth less than half of GFI's 91.94%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
12.55%
Positive growth while GFI shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.36%
Margin expansion while GFI shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A change of 156.46% while GFI maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses change of 323.19% while GFI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth while GFI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.61%
Total costs growth while GFI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.12%
Interest expense change of 31.12% while GFI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
4.87%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x GFI's 4.09%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
-3.85%
EBITDA decline while GFI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.52%
Other expenses reduction while GFI shows 98.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.99%
Pre-tax income decline while GFI shows 117.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while GFI shows 119.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth while GFI reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.93%
Net income decline while GFI shows 105.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while GFI shows 105.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
EPS decline while GFI shows 104.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
Diluted EPS decline while GFI shows 104.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GFI's 11.60%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GFI's 2.89%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.