95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 4.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.12%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 52.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.63%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.43%
Margin expansion while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.13%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 110.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.06%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 93.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.25%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 70.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.51%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.25%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.56%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Operating margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.43%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 156.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.48%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.52%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
775.68%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.89%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.71%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.37%
Share count increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.16%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.