PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.51%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 3.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
0.37%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 5.51%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.54%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.94%
Margin expansion while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-680.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-506.47%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-134.42%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
D&A growth less than half of KGC's 8.40%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
96.31%
EBITDA growth below 50% of KGC's 348.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
86.99%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of KGC's 401.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
118.24%
Operating income growth below 50% of KGC's 488.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
108.82%
Operating margin growth below 50% of KGC's 468.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
258.57%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.39%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
109.92%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4162.76%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.52%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.97%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.92%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.95%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.