PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.05%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 18.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.69%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 22.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.94%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 12.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of KGC's 29.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
15.76%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of KGC's 24.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-2.08%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 22.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
83.18%
Interest expense change of 83.18% while KGC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.76%
Similar D&A growth to KGC's 20.13%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-4.94%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 12.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.37%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of KGC's 19.99%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 3.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-488.93%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.36%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 38.11%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 32.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.