95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.55%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 68.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.93%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 49.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-29.83%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 92.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.75%
Margin decline while KGC shows 14.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.76%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 182.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-55.20%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 106.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.61%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 63.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 39.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.00%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 154.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.95%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 89.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.25%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to KGC's 12.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-19.91%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 82.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.58%
Similar operating margin growth to KGC's 8.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-119.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.84%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 121.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 31.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.17%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 24.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.31%
Net income decline while KGC shows 148.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of KGC's 47.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.00%
EPS decline while KGC shows 150.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.11%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 150.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 1.80%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while KGC shows 1.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.