95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.55%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 5.93%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-38.61%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 1.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
42.29%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
28.71%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x KGC's 8.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.97%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 18.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-35.51%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 2.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.29%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.26%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 6.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.13%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.40%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 14.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.86%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 7.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4021.42%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2353.67%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.33%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.94%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-73.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.23%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.16%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while KGC shows 0.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.