PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 5.42%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.97%
Cost growth above 1.5x KGC's 4.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
25.66%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 6.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.06%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
G&A change of 66.32% while KGC maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.46%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 15.03%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.64%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KGC's 6.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.94%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.89%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 1.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.44%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.79%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 5.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.36%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.11%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
278.87%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.62%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.03%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
189.28%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.19%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
EPS change of 20.00% while KGC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
23.53%
Diluted EPS change of 23.53% while KGC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.