95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.60%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.16%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 454.51%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.21%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-188.44%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 1868.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.33%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 411.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.09%
Total costs growth less than half of KGC's 451.53%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.32%
Similar D&A growth to KGC's 29.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
3.46%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.18%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-395.45%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 81.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
7.19%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.46%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.02%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.