95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.61%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.09%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
1.81%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 119.28%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 22.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.35%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.07%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 7.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.14%
Total costs growth less than half of KGC's 103.89%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-25.89%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 217.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.43%
D&A growth less than half of KGC's 12.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.61%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.87%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.31%
Other expenses growth less than half of KGC's 68460.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.25%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-885.93%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
21.86%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.12%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Share count increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.39%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.