95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.84%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.63%
Cost increase while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.28%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 102.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.54%
Margin decline while KGC shows 104.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
Other expenses growth less than half of KGC's 225.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-59.13%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 70.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.55%
Total costs growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.94%
Interest expense growth less than half of KGC's 31.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
19.52%
D&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 11.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
8.28%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 11.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-969.24%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 22.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
86.49%
Tax expense growth less than half of KGC's 188.05%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.84%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.