95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.68%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.85%
Cost increase while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.02%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-399.25%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.04%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 8.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.38%
Total costs growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.88%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 20.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.76%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
3.07%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.37%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.30%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.70%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.53%
Net income decline while KGC shows 81.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.15%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 90.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share count change of 0.07% while KGC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.02%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.