95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.46%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.50%
Cost increase while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.06%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 6.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.56%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x KGC's 1215.38%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
-1.79%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
20.94%
Total costs growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
24.09%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-139.74%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 22.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.66%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of KGC's 10.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
16.70%
Operating income growth 50-75% of KGC's 28.46%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-2.31%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 31.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2772.70%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 278.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-307.96%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 186.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 193.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.86%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-306.84%
Net income decline while KGC shows 262.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-273.15%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 269.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-306.67%
EPS decline while KGC shows 260.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-306.67%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 240.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.