95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.41%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 6.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
10.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x KGC's 6.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-9.76%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 7.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.47%
Margin decline while KGC shows 0.69% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.46%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.76%
Similar other expenses growth to KGC's 110.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-41.50%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 67.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.56%
Total costs growth less than half of KGC's 13.93%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.69%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 0.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.99%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.02%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
64.26%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 43.19%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-5.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.04%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 1271.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.33%
Net income decline while KGC shows 92.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 92.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
EPS decline while KGC shows 92.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.71%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 92.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.14%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 2.75%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 1.63%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.