95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-27.76%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 4.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-17.03%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 3.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-37.06%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 8.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-12.87%
Margin decline while KGC shows 3.93% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 34.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.29%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.33%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.65%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of KGC's 23.57%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-3.73%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 18.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.50%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 73.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.18%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 66.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18698.59%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 23.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
39.65%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of KGC's 131.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
93.31%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to KGC's 122.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
5873.13%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.79%
Net income growth below 50% of KGC's 261.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
82.42%
Net margin growth below 50% of KGC's 254.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.30%
EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 260.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 259.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.05%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 1.04%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.