95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.27%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.18%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 24.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.28%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 32.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.10%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 33.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
140.62%
Marketing expense growth while KGC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
70.89%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.25%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 585.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.73%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.63%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.57%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 0.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.65%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to KGC's 2.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-4.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.58%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 3.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
888.96%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 83.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-3.79%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 10.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of KGC's 17.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
99.20%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.61%
Net income decline while KGC shows 63.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of KGC's 74.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.26%
EPS decline while KGC shows 58.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.26%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 57.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.02%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.93%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.