PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-75.96%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 4.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.96%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
447.14%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-17.90%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 12.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 19.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-98.92%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.53%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 8.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
246.56%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
709.56%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-99.06%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
182.08%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 12.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
441.37%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 7.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
183.33%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 10.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
183.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 10.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.