PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.91%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-7.49%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-13.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.54%
Other expenses change of 42.54% while NEM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
2.73%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NEM's 9.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.10%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.70%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-121.15%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 4.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.99%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 27.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 51.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.54%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 71.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.50%
Net income decline while NEM shows 22.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.60%
Net margin growth below 50% of NEM's 46.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.67%
EPS decline while NEM shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.61%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.64%
Diluted share change of 1.64% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.