PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.93%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 11.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-27.84%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 8.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.34%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 13.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.24%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x NEM's 1.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 23.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1243.06%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 21.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-31.77%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 20.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-28.35%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 12.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.44%
Interest expense growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.92%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 9.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.74%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 20.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.54%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.55%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 8.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.21%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2074.36%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.62%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 28.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.14%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NEM's 15.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-81.35%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 30.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.36%
Net income decline while NEM shows 31.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.71%
Net margin growth below 50% of NEM's 18.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.00%
EPS decline while NEM shows 32.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.00%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 32.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.05%
Share count change of 0.05% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.12%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.