95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
78.11%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
153.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x NEM's 98.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
56.56%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.08%
G&A growth while NEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.59%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
84.79%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.89%
Total costs growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1333.12%
Interest expense growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
230.63%
D&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.31%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
75.24%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 8.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.72%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 13.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
56.27%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 16.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-12.26%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 16.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-163.83%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
54.64%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 12.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-13.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 12.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1487.52%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.49%
Net income growth 50-75% of NEM's 83.38%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-16.63%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 83.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
47.06%
EPS growth 50-75% of NEM's 82.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of NEM's 82.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.14%
Share count change of 0.14% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.