95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.63%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.02%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 10.03%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
9.27%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.93%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 28.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-21.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.93%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x NEM's 8.06%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-1.35%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.65%
D&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.92%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
16.07%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.27%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-535.20%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 16.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
170.24%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x NEM's 11.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-92.92%
Net income decline while NEM shows 18.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.66%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 19.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
EPS decline while NEM shows 19.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-94.44%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 19.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.20%
Share count change of 0.20% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.