PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.36%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 15.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.70%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-25.34%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 139.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.78%
Margin decline while NEM shows 106.97% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.99%
G&A growth less than half of NEM's 6.67%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-256.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.98%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NEM's 31.98%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.06%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.35%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 60.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.08%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 40.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.34%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 356.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.78%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 295.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
87.31%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
905.79%
Similar pre-tax income growth to NEM's 884.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
1088.34%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 751.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-235.01%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 429.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1057.27%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1267.31%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.48%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.44%
Diluted share change of 3.44% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.