95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.42%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-26.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.86%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 1.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.96%
Margin expansion 50-75% of NEM's 9.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
G&A change of 114.57% while NEM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.49%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 103.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
106.14%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.15%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.60%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 237.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 28.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.52%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 51.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 63.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
91.81%
Similar other expenses growth to NEM's 91.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
474.46%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 121.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
650.14%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 123.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
168.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of NEM's 1275.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
463.45%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 113.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
635.77%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 114.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 113.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 113.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.