95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.17%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 9.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.48%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 6.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.25%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 15.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.42%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 5.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
Similar G&A growth to NEM's 5.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.45%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 3600.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.37%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 15.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.19%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 7.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.60%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 9.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
0.46%
D&A growth less than half of NEM's 11.86%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
0.89%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.97%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.15%
Operating income growth below 50% of NEM's 16.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.32%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of NEM's 6.19%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-20.44%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.18%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.35%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-25.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2.06%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.23%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.22%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.