PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.87%
Revenue growth below 50% of NEM's 21.49%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.55%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 14.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
18.63%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 46.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.98%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 20.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
G&A growth while NEM reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of NEM's 572.13%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
99.80%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NEM's 244.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.28%
Total costs growth less than half of NEM's 41.62%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.64%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.21%
D&A growth less than half of NEM's 136.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.91%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 7280.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-203.03%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 16.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.44%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.95%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.07%
Share count change of 0.07% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.09%
Diluted share change of 0.09% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.