95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.19%
Revenue growth below 50% of NEM's 7.75%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-9.45%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.00%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 28.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.71%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 19.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.61%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
375.31%
Marketing expense change of 375.31% while NEM maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
3913.82%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.05%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 6.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.63%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 0.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.70%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 10.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.09%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.21%
EBITDA growth below 50% of NEM's 51.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.52%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 6.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.22%
Operating income growth below 50% of NEM's 32.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NEM's 22.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-33.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of NEM's 142.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.60%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NEM's 124.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
188027.38%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.44%
Net income decline while NEM shows 401.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.31%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 365.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while NEM shows 428.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 428.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count change of 0.07% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.